- Home
- Materials
- Methodological Foundations of the Series
- Introduction to the Series
- Living Systems
- Structural Dynamics of the Evolution
- Animal Magnetism
- Territories and Landscapes
- Cultural Systems
- Shamanic Practices of North America
- Religious Systems
- SSIFS: Hybrid Information-Field Systems
- Digital Environments
- Economic Systems
- Spatiotemporal Logic of Structural Systems
- Conclusion of the Article Series
- Learning
- Blog
- About us
- Contacts
- English
10. Shamanic Practices of North America: Between Protocol and Myth
Structural Protocols of Interaction with the Environment and Their Cultural Transformation
10.1. Abstract
This article examines the shamanic practices of Indigenous peoples of North America as a set of stable protocols for interaction between living systems and territorial and cultural configurations. Within the Approach to the Evaluation of Structural Imprints, it is shown that these practices do not require explanation through mystical entities or exceptional abilities and can be described as structurally stabilized regimes of calibration that emerged under specific spatiotemporal conditions.
A distinction is drawn between the protocol core of these practices and their subsequent mythologization. The analysis shows how territorial imprints, collective repetition, and cultural inertia contributed to the formation of one of the most stable and effective traditional systems of environmental interaction.
10.2. Shamanism as an Object of Structural Analysis
10.2.1. Beyond Binary Interpretations
In both academic and popular discourse, shamanic practices are often interpreted within a binary framework: either as manifestations of “ancient knowledge” or as products of mythological thinking. Both approaches are methodologically insufficient, as they fail to explain the stability, reproducibility, and practical effectiveness of these forms. Structural analysis offers a third path: to treat shamanic practices as a set of stable protocols formed through prolonged interaction among living systems, territory, and culture.
10.2.2. Protocol Instead of Belief and the Role of the Operator
In this context, a protocol is understood as a repeatable and reproducible sequence of actions that establishes a specific mode of interaction with the environment. A protocol does not require justification through belief or interpretation; its effectiveness is determined by the degree of alignment with the territorial and cultural configuration.
A key element in the realization of a protocol is the operator—a living system directly engaged in the practice and capable of maintaining alignment with the environmental configuration. The operator is not a source of influence but an active element of the system through which the protocol is realized under concrete conditions.
10.3. Territorial Conditions of Practice Formation
10.3.1. Spatial Specificity of North America
Shamanic practices in North America developed under conditions characterized by:
• vast territorial extent;
• pronounced diversity of landscapes;
• the presence of zones with deep temporal “transparency”;
• relative stability in the use of the same territories over long periods.
These conditions facilitated the accumulation of dense and stable territorial imprints to which living systems had to attune.
10.3.2. Information as a State of the System
Within the present analysis, information is treated not as a transmitted signal or message but as a state of the system that becomes accessible to the operator under specific regimes of connectivity and calibration.
In territories with a high density and complexity of imprints, such regimes arise more frequently, creating preconditions for the emergence of specialized protocols of interaction.
10.4. The Protocol Core of Shamanic Practices and the Role of the Operator
10.4.1. The Operator as an Active Element of the Configuration
One of the key features of North American shamanic practices is the explicitly expressed and non-substitutable role of the operator. Unlike later religious systems—where operator functions become institutionalized or replaced by dogmatic structures—shamanic practices preserve the operator as an active element of the configuration.
Here, the operator is understood as a living system capable of entering unstable regimes, maintaining alignment with territorial and collective imprints, and exiting these regimes without loss of its own calibration.
10.4.2. Connection Nodes and Ritual Protocols
Ritual practices in shamanism can be interpreted as stable protocols for identifying, activating, and temporarily stabilizing connection nodes within a complex system. Connection nodes are points of heightened connectivity where information about the system’s state beyond the operator’s local position becomes accessible.
Rituals do not create connection nodes; they allow the operator—or a collective of operators—to enter configurations in which such nodes become accessible.
10.4.3. Viewing the Territory as Access to Information Within the System
Practices of “viewing the territory,” including the use of a flying bird (notably the eagle), represent neither metaphor nor indirect observation but a form of direct interaction with information within a unified systemic configuration.
The shaman and the bird are treated as elements of a single system already embedded in territorial dynamics. The bird functions as a mobile perceptual node positioned differently in space but within the same structural configuration. Access to information occurs through inclusion in the shared system, not through interpretation or symbolic transfer.
10.4.4. Ritual Dances, Diagnostics, and Anticipation
Ritual dances served to bring the system into an unstable regime with a reduced role of internal self-referential loops. In such states, the operator and the collective could distinguish probabilistic scenarios related to weather, hunting, warfare, or social interaction.
This does not involve prediction of the future but rather structural diagnostics—the recognition of misalignments and potential transitions prior to their full realization.
10.4.5. Effects on the State of Living Systems
Influence on ill members of the community did not involve treatment in the modern medical sense. Instead, practices created conditions under which the intensity of psychosomatic loops was reduced, regulatory resources were redistributed, and modes of self-calibration were altered, potentially enhancing self-regenerative processes. The effect was achieved by modifying the structural conditions of system functioning rather than by direct intervention in the organism as an object.
10.4.6. Limits and Vulnerabilities of the Protocol Approach
The high effectiveness of shamanic practices was possible only as long as the operator’s active role was preserved and protocols were followed with precision. Loss of sensitivity, excessive personalization, or rigid symbolic fixation led to reduced access to connection nodes and diminished effectiveness.
This explains why such practices rarely survived radical cultural transformations without losing their protocol core.
10.5. Collective Use of Practices
10.5.1. Distributed Calibration
Shamanic practices often had a collective character, which allowed:
• reduction of individual distortions;
• distribution of calibration load;
• stabilization of effects through participant synchronization.
In this sense, shamanism functioned as a distributed mechanism of collective calibration embedded within the cultural system.
10.5.2. Integration with Everyday Life
Protocol elements of shamanic practices were closely integrated with everyday activities—hunting, movement, seasonal rhythms, and social interactions. This prevented their isolation and contributed to their long-term preservation.
10.6. From Protocol to Myth
10.6.1. The Inevitability of Mythologization
As practices were transmitted across generations, a gradual shift occurred from protocol-based description to mythological framing. Myth did not generate the practice but served as a means of cultural fixation in the absence of a formalized analytical language.
10.6.2. Personalization and Symbolization
Mythologization was accompanied by personalization of environmental effects, the introduction of spirits and entities, and symbolic explanations of structural processes. These elements did not enhance the protocol but ensured its cultural persistence.
10.7. Why North American Shamanism Proved Especially Stable
10.7.1. Convergence of Three Levels
The stability and effectiveness of North American shamanic practices are explained by the convergence of:
1. dense and diverse territorial imprints;
2. high sensitivity of living systems to environmental conditions;
3. cultural mechanisms for stabilizing and transmitting protocols.
10.7.2. Absence of Early Institutionalization
The lack of rigid institutionalization and dogmatization allowed practices to retain flexibility and adaptability, preventing premature fixation of symbolic interpretations at the expense of protocol effectiveness.
10.8. Methodological Limits of the Analysis
The present analysis does not evaluate the truth of mythological beliefs nor aim to reproduce practices. Its purpose is to demonstrate mechanisms through which stable protocols of interaction emerge in complex systems and to distinguish structural from interpretative levels of description.
10.9. Conclusion
Shamanic practices of North America exemplify how, under specific territorial conditions, stable protocols of environmental interaction can form with high reproducibility and practical significance. Their mythological framing is secondary and functions to culturally fix and transmit experience rather than to explain the effects themselves.
The preservation and continued effectiveness of these practices are not due to “special knowledge” or the mystical status of shamanism but to a unique combination of factors: long-term territorial stability, low density of external structural interventions, continuity of environmental conditions, and the absence of systems that forcibly recalibrate local interaction protocols. Within these parameters, shamanism was not displaced but stabilized as a functional mode of alignment with the environment.
The Approach to the Evaluation of Structural Imprints allows shamanism to be treated not as a mystical exception but as a particular case of distributed calibration within a complex system—stable precisely because the conditions of its formation and reproduction remained relatively unchanged over long periods. This section thus prepares the transition to the analysis of more complex biosocial and hybrid systems in which structural imprints become formalized, scaled, and mediated, while simultaneously losing the local sensitivity characteristic of early territorial practices.
10.1. Abstract
This article examines the shamanic practices of Indigenous peoples of North America as a set of stable protocols for interaction between living systems and territorial and cultural configurations. Within the Approach to the Evaluation of Structural Imprints, it is shown that these practices do not require explanation through mystical entities or exceptional abilities and can be described as structurally stabilized regimes of calibration that emerged under specific spatiotemporal conditions.
A distinction is drawn between the protocol core of these practices and their subsequent mythologization. The analysis shows how territorial imprints, collective repetition, and cultural inertia contributed to the formation of one of the most stable and effective traditional systems of environmental interaction.
10.2. Shamanism as an Object of Structural Analysis
10.2.1. Beyond Binary Interpretations
In both academic and popular discourse, shamanic practices are often interpreted within a binary framework: either as manifestations of “ancient knowledge” or as products of mythological thinking. Both approaches are methodologically insufficient, as they fail to explain the stability, reproducibility, and practical effectiveness of these forms. Structural analysis offers a third path: to treat shamanic practices as a set of stable protocols formed through prolonged interaction among living systems, territory, and culture.
10.2.2. Protocol Instead of Belief and the Role of the Operator
In this context, a protocol is understood as a repeatable and reproducible sequence of actions that establishes a specific mode of interaction with the environment. A protocol does not require justification through belief or interpretation; its effectiveness is determined by the degree of alignment with the territorial and cultural configuration.
A key element in the realization of a protocol is the operator—a living system directly engaged in the practice and capable of maintaining alignment with the environmental configuration. The operator is not a source of influence but an active element of the system through which the protocol is realized under concrete conditions.
10.3. Territorial Conditions of Practice Formation
10.3.1. Spatial Specificity of North America
Shamanic practices in North America developed under conditions characterized by:
• vast territorial extent;
• pronounced diversity of landscapes;
• the presence of zones with deep temporal “transparency”;
• relative stability in the use of the same territories over long periods.
These conditions facilitated the accumulation of dense and stable territorial imprints to which living systems had to attune.
10.3.2. Information as a State of the System
Within the present analysis, information is treated not as a transmitted signal or message but as a state of the system that becomes accessible to the operator under specific regimes of connectivity and calibration.
In territories with a high density and complexity of imprints, such regimes arise more frequently, creating preconditions for the emergence of specialized protocols of interaction.
10.4. The Protocol Core of Shamanic Practices and the Role of the Operator
10.4.1. The Operator as an Active Element of the Configuration
One of the key features of North American shamanic practices is the explicitly expressed and non-substitutable role of the operator. Unlike later religious systems—where operator functions become institutionalized or replaced by dogmatic structures—shamanic practices preserve the operator as an active element of the configuration.
Here, the operator is understood as a living system capable of entering unstable regimes, maintaining alignment with territorial and collective imprints, and exiting these regimes without loss of its own calibration.
10.4.2. Connection Nodes and Ritual Protocols
Ritual practices in shamanism can be interpreted as stable protocols for identifying, activating, and temporarily stabilizing connection nodes within a complex system. Connection nodes are points of heightened connectivity where information about the system’s state beyond the operator’s local position becomes accessible.
Rituals do not create connection nodes; they allow the operator—or a collective of operators—to enter configurations in which such nodes become accessible.
10.4.3. Viewing the Territory as Access to Information Within the System
Practices of “viewing the territory,” including the use of a flying bird (notably the eagle), represent neither metaphor nor indirect observation but a form of direct interaction with information within a unified systemic configuration.
The shaman and the bird are treated as elements of a single system already embedded in territorial dynamics. The bird functions as a mobile perceptual node positioned differently in space but within the same structural configuration. Access to information occurs through inclusion in the shared system, not through interpretation or symbolic transfer.
10.4.4. Ritual Dances, Diagnostics, and Anticipation
Ritual dances served to bring the system into an unstable regime with a reduced role of internal self-referential loops. In such states, the operator and the collective could distinguish probabilistic scenarios related to weather, hunting, warfare, or social interaction.
This does not involve prediction of the future but rather structural diagnostics—the recognition of misalignments and potential transitions prior to their full realization.
10.4.5. Effects on the State of Living Systems
Influence on ill members of the community did not involve treatment in the modern medical sense. Instead, practices created conditions under which the intensity of psychosomatic loops was reduced, regulatory resources were redistributed, and modes of self-calibration were altered, potentially enhancing self-regenerative processes. The effect was achieved by modifying the structural conditions of system functioning rather than by direct intervention in the organism as an object.
10.4.6. Limits and Vulnerabilities of the Protocol Approach
The high effectiveness of shamanic practices was possible only as long as the operator’s active role was preserved and protocols were followed with precision. Loss of sensitivity, excessive personalization, or rigid symbolic fixation led to reduced access to connection nodes and diminished effectiveness.
This explains why such practices rarely survived radical cultural transformations without losing their protocol core.
10.5. Collective Use of Practices
10.5.1. Distributed Calibration
Shamanic practices often had a collective character, which allowed:
• reduction of individual distortions;
• distribution of calibration load;
• stabilization of effects through participant synchronization.
In this sense, shamanism functioned as a distributed mechanism of collective calibration embedded within the cultural system.
10.5.2. Integration with Everyday Life
Protocol elements of shamanic practices were closely integrated with everyday activities—hunting, movement, seasonal rhythms, and social interactions. This prevented their isolation and contributed to their long-term preservation.
10.6. From Protocol to Myth
10.6.1. The Inevitability of Mythologization
As practices were transmitted across generations, a gradual shift occurred from protocol-based description to mythological framing. Myth did not generate the practice but served as a means of cultural fixation in the absence of a formalized analytical language.
10.6.2. Personalization and Symbolization
Mythologization was accompanied by personalization of environmental effects, the introduction of spirits and entities, and symbolic explanations of structural processes. These elements did not enhance the protocol but ensured its cultural persistence.
10.7. Why North American Shamanism Proved Especially Stable
10.7.1. Convergence of Three Levels
The stability and effectiveness of North American shamanic practices are explained by the convergence of:
1. dense and diverse territorial imprints;
2. high sensitivity of living systems to environmental conditions;
3. cultural mechanisms for stabilizing and transmitting protocols.
10.7.2. Absence of Early Institutionalization
The lack of rigid institutionalization and dogmatization allowed practices to retain flexibility and adaptability, preventing premature fixation of symbolic interpretations at the expense of protocol effectiveness.
10.8. Methodological Limits of the Analysis
The present analysis does not evaluate the truth of mythological beliefs nor aim to reproduce practices. Its purpose is to demonstrate mechanisms through which stable protocols of interaction emerge in complex systems and to distinguish structural from interpretative levels of description.
10.9. Conclusion
Shamanic practices of North America exemplify how, under specific territorial conditions, stable protocols of environmental interaction can form with high reproducibility and practical significance. Their mythological framing is secondary and functions to culturally fix and transmit experience rather than to explain the effects themselves.
The preservation and continued effectiveness of these practices are not due to “special knowledge” or the mystical status of shamanism but to a unique combination of factors: long-term territorial stability, low density of external structural interventions, continuity of environmental conditions, and the absence of systems that forcibly recalibrate local interaction protocols. Within these parameters, shamanism was not displaced but stabilized as a functional mode of alignment with the environment.
The Approach to the Evaluation of Structural Imprints allows shamanism to be treated not as a mystical exception but as a particular case of distributed calibration within a complex system—stable precisely because the conditions of its formation and reproduction remained relatively unchanged over long periods. This section thus prepares the transition to the analysis of more complex biosocial and hybrid systems in which structural imprints become formalized, scaled, and mediated, while simultaneously losing the local sensitivity characteristic of early territorial practices.